House Rules
I've noticed that since Aidan has hit full-blown toddler status, I've been keeping a list of mental rules for dealing with various situations. Last night it hit me-- these rules aren't just applicable to him, or even toddlers in general. Here, for the first time, I present them as a model which I feel could be used to great effect if implemented as standing US foreign policy guidelines.
1. We WILL negotiate with toddlers.
Contrary to popular belief, negotiation is a valid tactic when used with a bit of common sense. A hardline stance against negotiation serves only to foster deadlocks and resentment; by negotiating with the little guy, he can begin to understand that most situations have an outcome which is agreeable to all parties. Of course, he can't really respond verbally, but it's clear that he understands most of what's going on. However....
2. Negotiation will not work, however well intended, during a screaming fit.
This goes for both he AND I. The first step to successful communication involves getting everyone calm...or, in his case, calmer-ER. Because, well, it's really hard to hear someone else when you're screaming your lungs out.
3. If negotiations break down, it is safe to ACT like you are ignoring the situation.
Let's face it: at the end of the day, I'm bigger, stronger, and have way more willpower (contrary to what my wife may believe). So I can outlast and deal with anything he has to throw at me, from screaming to throwing things to tears. Note the important qualifier in the statement:act. At no time am I actually ignoring what he's doing, because I love him and I don't want him to hurt himself or break something. But he doesn't know that, and eventually he will tire of yelling/crying/throwing and come over to see me for "negotiations"...or for comfort, or maybe he'll even go find something else to amuse himself. In any of these situations, I win.
4. Pacifiers are just that: pacifiers.
It is the easiest thing in the world to pop a binky in his mouth when he's having a meltdown...but not the smartest. All that serves to do is PERHAPS quiet him a little. He's still angry and will likely carry on doing whatever he was doing before. Pacifiers are not a long term solution and shouldn't be used as such.
5. "Time out" doesn't mean anything to someone who fails to grasp the concept of right and wrong.
Yeah, obvious, I know...but true. He's too little to know why we're telling him not to do things, and in time he will understand. For now, though, this is cruel and unnecessary punishment. And that's bad, m'kay?
So those are pretty much my current 5 golden rules. They have changed somewhat....when he was first born, for example they were more along the lines of "Don't shake the baby", or "Waking up a baby is really, really stupid so don't so it", and the ever popular "The one who is holding the baby when the poopsplosion occurs is by law required to change the diaper." That last one was always my personal favorite.
1. We WILL negotiate with toddlers.
Contrary to popular belief, negotiation is a valid tactic when used with a bit of common sense. A hardline stance against negotiation serves only to foster deadlocks and resentment; by negotiating with the little guy, he can begin to understand that most situations have an outcome which is agreeable to all parties. Of course, he can't really respond verbally, but it's clear that he understands most of what's going on. However....
2. Negotiation will not work, however well intended, during a screaming fit.
This goes for both he AND I. The first step to successful communication involves getting everyone calm...or, in his case, calmer-ER. Because, well, it's really hard to hear someone else when you're screaming your lungs out.
3. If negotiations break down, it is safe to ACT like you are ignoring the situation.
Let's face it: at the end of the day, I'm bigger, stronger, and have way more willpower (contrary to what my wife may believe). So I can outlast and deal with anything he has to throw at me, from screaming to throwing things to tears. Note the important qualifier in the statement:act. At no time am I actually ignoring what he's doing, because I love him and I don't want him to hurt himself or break something. But he doesn't know that, and eventually he will tire of yelling/crying/throwing and come over to see me for "negotiations"...or for comfort, or maybe he'll even go find something else to amuse himself. In any of these situations, I win.
4. Pacifiers are just that: pacifiers.
It is the easiest thing in the world to pop a binky in his mouth when he's having a meltdown...but not the smartest. All that serves to do is PERHAPS quiet him a little. He's still angry and will likely carry on doing whatever he was doing before. Pacifiers are not a long term solution and shouldn't be used as such.
5. "Time out" doesn't mean anything to someone who fails to grasp the concept of right and wrong.
Yeah, obvious, I know...but true. He's too little to know why we're telling him not to do things, and in time he will understand. For now, though, this is cruel and unnecessary punishment. And that's bad, m'kay?
So those are pretty much my current 5 golden rules. They have changed somewhat....when he was first born, for example they were more along the lines of "Don't shake the baby", or "Waking up a baby is really, really stupid so don't so it", and the ever popular "The one who is holding the baby when the poopsplosion occurs is by law required to change the diaper." That last one was always my personal favorite.

